It is said that the CEO and other corporate leaders are keepers of the organization’s memory. Please discuss this.


The organization’s so called “memory” is knowledge gleaned through the storage and preservation of intellectual capital but it also includes knowledge held by key employees. 

Some of that knowledge is explicit knowledge that core members can access easily, but some of that knowledge is not easily documented, and is called “tacit” knowledge. We believe that knowledge (widely known or tacit) can be transferred through systems, processes, people—which is tantamount to sharing of best practices. However, when those learnings cease to provide any value proposition to the organization, “unlearning” needs to occur. 

This is essentially a process whereby people, structures, systems, processes erase the knowledge that no longer is a value add to the firm. So replacing dysfunctional policies (i.e., time clocks for knowledge workers engaged in globally distributed work; removing dress codes and other etiquette formalities are examples of erasing old processes that no longer work in our globalized world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“All decisions are ethical decisions.” Comment on this statement, particularly by referring to the concepts of moral intensity and moral sensitivity.

Is it possible to have a knowledge of what an organizational culture is before you become a part of the organization? How important is it for you to align yourself with your organizational culture?

The chief of police in a large city government describes the problem of getting his officers to do paperwork. The officers enjoy working with the public and apprehending criminals, not sitting at a desk. The paperwork is boring, but can make the difference in convictions. The Chief has no financial rewards (budget crunch) and promotions are determined by seniority, not the quality of paperwork. Officers were trained to perform street work, not fill out forms. Arrests, not paperwork, get noticed. Conviction success is due to too many factors to be a performance criterion. Use the MARS model of individual behavior and performance to diagnose the possible causes of the unacceptable behavior. Has the captain considered all possible solutions to the problems? If not, what else might he do?