It is said that the CEO and other corporate leaders are keepers of the organization’s memory. Please discuss this.


The organization’s so called “memory” is knowledge gleaned through the storage and preservation of intellectual capital but it also includes knowledge held by key employees. 

Some of that knowledge is explicit knowledge that core members can access easily, but some of that knowledge is not easily documented, and is called “tacit” knowledge. We believe that knowledge (widely known or tacit) can be transferred through systems, processes, people—which is tantamount to sharing of best practices. However, when those learnings cease to provide any value proposition to the organization, “unlearning” needs to occur. 

This is essentially a process whereby people, structures, systems, processes erase the knowledge that no longer is a value add to the firm. So replacing dysfunctional policies (i.e., time clocks for knowledge workers engaged in globally distributed work; removing dress codes and other etiquette formalities are examples of erasing old processes that no longer work in our globalized world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“All decisions are ethical decisions.” Comment on this statement, particularly by referring to the concepts of moral intensity and moral sensitivity.

After hearing a seminar on organizational learning, a mining company executive argues that this perspective ignores the fact that mining companies could not rely on knowledge alone to stay in business. They also need physical capital (such as digging and ore processing equipment) and land (where the minerals are located). In fact, these two may be more important than what employees carry around in their heads. Evaluate the mining executive’s comments.

Is it possible to have a knowledge of what an organizational culture is before you become a part of the organization? How important is it for you to align yourself with your organizational culture?