Recall a traumatic event, such as the falling of the Twin Towers in NYC (9/11 attacks), or the bombing of several hotels and restaurants in Mumbai, or the children killed recently in an American school. Based on what you have learned in this chapter, discuss what has happened to you in terms of your cognitive reasoning, your emotional reactions, and your ability to logically deal with these stressful situations.


It is clear that our emotions shape attitudes (both inside organizations and outside of them). It is also clear that attitudes influence work-related behaviors. We cannot dismiss the attitudes we have formed outside of our organizations, as they can carry over into our work-related domains very easily. The question prompts you to recall how you “felt” when you observed (likely on television or the internet) horrific events. Since cognition precedes emotion, one can only imagine that the cognitively horrific images caused emotional reactions that lacked “words” or even narratives that defined what those images conveyed. That is why people often react with phrases such as “I’m speechless,” or “words cannot express what I feel…” Indeed, the R-mode (emotional side) of the brain takes over and the L-mode (cognitive) recedes in highly stressful events. That is why people often cannot even “talk” about what they have just observed. Because people differ in their ability to psychologically translate these phenomena, personality differences may allow them to cognitively reason through, and come to a conclusion more swiftly than others may be able to.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“All decisions are ethical decisions.” Comment on this statement, particularly by referring to the concepts of moral intensity and moral sensitivity.

Is it possible to have a knowledge of what an organizational culture is before you become a part of the organization? How important is it for you to align yourself with your organizational culture?

The chief of police in a large city government describes the problem of getting his officers to do paperwork. The officers enjoy working with the public and apprehending criminals, not sitting at a desk. The paperwork is boring, but can make the difference in convictions. The Chief has no financial rewards (budget crunch) and promotions are determined by seniority, not the quality of paperwork. Officers were trained to perform street work, not fill out forms. Arrests, not paperwork, get noticed. Conviction success is due to too many factors to be a performance criterion. Use the MARS model of individual behavior and performance to diagnose the possible causes of the unacceptable behavior. Has the captain considered all possible solutions to the problems? If not, what else might he do?